top of page
bg.png

Matter Management Process Guide

A step-by-step workflow for intake, engagement, planning, staffing, execution, timekeeping, budgeting, billing readiness, closure, and analysis.

Matter management process

Legal workflow

Law firm operations

A matter management process defines how a law firm receives, authorizes, plans, performs, records, bills, closes, and learns from legal work.

The process should prevent a matter from depending entirely on one person’s memory.

A reliable workflow creates visible answers to questions such as:

  • Has the firm accepted the engagement?

  • Is the matter authorized for work?

  • Who owns the next step?

  • What is the scope?

  • Which deadlines apply?

  • Has the budget been approved?

  • Is the team recording time promptly?

  • Is the work ready for billing?

  • Has the client received required updates?

  • Can the matter be closed?

This guide provides an operational model. Firms should adapt it to their practice areas, jurisdictions, client requirements, and technology.

Process Overview

A practical matter management process contains twelve stages:

  1. Legal service request or client intake

  2. Initial screening

  3. Conflict and engagement approval

  4. Matter opening

  5. Scope and objective definition

  6. Planning and budgeting

  7. Staffing and responsibility assignment

  8. Work execution and communication

  9. Time, expense, and status capture

  10. Billing readiness and invoice workflow

  11. Completion and closure

  12. Post-matter review and knowledge capture

The stages may overlap.

Urgent legal work may begin before every administrative step is complete, but the exception should be documented and resolved promptly.

Matter management process lifecycle for law firms from intake and planning through legal work, billing, and matter closure.
The matter management process connects intake, opening, planning, execution, billing, and closure.

Stage 1: Intake

Intake creates a structured record of the request.

Capture:

  • Requesting person

  • Prospective client

  • Contact details

  • Matter type

  • Description

  • Jurisdiction

  • Adverse parties

  • Urgency

  • Expected deadline

  • Documents received

  • How the client found the firm

  • Requested outcome

  • Commercial information

For an existing client, intake should still identify the new matter and distinguish it from existing engagements.

The ABA recommends integrating intake with practice-management tools to reduce duplicate data entry and improve accuracy.

Stage 2: Initial Screening

Initial screening asks whether the work is appropriate for the firm.

Consider:

  • Practice fit

  • Jurisdiction

  • Capacity

  • Urgency

  • Competence

  • Client expectations

  • Strategic fit

  • Fee arrangement

  • Ability to pay

  • Risk

  • Conflicts

  • Required specialists

Possible outcomes:

  • Proceed to conflict review

  • Request more information

  • Refer elsewhere

  • Decline

  • Escalate for risk review

Record the decision.

Stage 3: Conflict and Engagement Approval

Before work begins, confirm the firm’s authorization process.

Possible controls include:

  • Conflict search

  • Conflict clearance

  • Waiver

  • Client identity verification

  • Engagement letter

  • Fee agreement

  • Scope

  • Rates

  • Retainer or deposit

  • Outside counsel guidelines

  • Privacy notice

  • Client consent

  • Work authorization

An opened matter should not be confused with an accepted engagement.

Create a visible status such as:

  • Intake

  • Conflict pending

  • Engagement pending

  • Authorized

  • On hold

  • Declined

Stage 4: Matter Opening

Create the authoritative matter record.

Required fields may include:

  • Client

  • Matter name

  • Matter number

  • Matter type

  • Practice area

  • Responsible lawyer

  • Billing lawyer

  • Open date

  • Billing arrangement

  • Rate schedule

  • Matter status

  • Security level

  • Ethical wall

  • Client guidelines

  • Budget requirement

  • Document workspace

  • Finance-system identifier

The matter should be created once and synchronized with connected systems where practical.

Stage 5: Scope and Objectives

Translate the engagement into operational terms.

Document:

  • Legal question

  • Business objective

  • Deliverables

  • Exclusions

  • Assumptions

  • Client dependencies

  • Key dates

  • Success measures

  • Reporting expectations

  • Fee arrangement

  • Change process

Avoid a scope description that is too broad to manage.

Example:

Weak:

Handle dispute.

Clearer:

Assess breach allegations, prepare response strategy, conduct initial settlement discussions, and defend the matter through the close of written discovery, subject to a separate budget and approval for trial.

The exact language depends on the engagement.

Stage 6: Planning and Budgeting

Build the matter plan.

A plan may include:

  • Phases

  • Tasks

  • Deliverables

  • Dependencies

  • Deadlines

  • Staffing

  • Budget

  • Risks

  • Client decisions

  • Communication schedule

  • Billing milestones

  • Assumptions

  • Escalation thresholds

For repeatable work, use a template.

The plan should be proportionate. A short advisory matter does not need the same structure as multi-year litigation.

Stage 7: Staffing and Responsibility Assignment

Assign visible roles.

Possible roles:

  • Accountable matter owner

  • Responsible lawyer

  • Working lawyer

  • Paralegal

  • Reviewer

  • Billing attorney

  • Finance contact

  • Project manager

  • Client contact

  • Decision maker

For each task, identify:

  • Owner

  • Reviewer

  • Due date

  • Status

  • Dependency

  • Approval requirement

See Responsibility Tracking in Law Firms.

Stage 8: Work Execution

The team performs the legal work.

The matter process should support:

  • Task completion

  • Document creation

  • Email filing

  • Research

  • Client communication

  • Internal review

  • Decisions

  • Work-product approval

  • Deadline updates

  • Change control

  • Risk escalation

The working team should not need to search several systems to learn the current status.

Stage 9: Time, Expense, and Status Capture

Record matter activity close to when it occurs.

A strong time entry includes:

  • Work date

  • Client and matter

  • Accurate duration

  • Billing status

  • Clear description

  • Required task or activity code

  • Review status

The process should also capture:

  • Expenses

  • Budget use

  • Task completion

  • Matter status

  • Client dependency

  • Decisions

  • Next step

Delayed time entry makes matter reporting and billing less reliable.

Stage 10: Ongoing Matter Review

Matter review should occur at a defined frequency.

Review:

  • Scope

  • Client objective

  • Current phase

  • Upcoming deadlines

  • Task status

  • Work allocation

  • Budget

  • WIP

  • Time-entry status

  • Risks

  • Decisions

  • Client updates

  • Billing readiness

The frequency may be:

  • Daily for urgent work

  • Weekly for active matters

  • Monthly for stable matters

  • Event-driven for milestone work

Record significant decisions.

Authoritative References

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main stages of a matter management process?

The main stages are intake, engagement approval, opening, planning, staffing, execution, time and status capture, billing readiness, completion, closure, and review.

The responsible lawyer usually owns legal delivery, while intake, conflicts, finance, records, and operations may own specific process stages.

The firm should define when work is authorized and which approvals are required before creating or activating the matter.

It is billing-ready when time, expenses, narratives, codes, rates, approvals, and client requirements are complete enough for prebill review.

MIRA supports time capture, time-entry preparation, lawyer review, and release of approved entries toward finance systems.

Wavy Surface

Build Time Capture into the Matter Workflow

MIRA helps law firms turn completed work from connected systems into draft time entries that lawyers can review inside Microsoft Teams.
bottom of page