
Track hours by partner, counsel, senior associate, junior associate, paralegal, legal assistant, specialist, or the firm's own role structure. The goal is to understand how the matter was delivered.
Why Total Hours Are Not Enough
Two matters can each require 100 hours but have very different cost and delivery profiles. One may be partner-heavy; another may use associates and paralegals more extensively.
Analyze by Matter Phase
Role mix should be examined by phase such as intake, research, drafting, discovery, negotiation, trial preparation, closing, or follow-up. Appropriate staffing can change through the matter.

Identify Repeated Senior-Level Work
Look for recurring routine review, status updates, basic research, or administrative coordination consuming senior time. Some may be delegable; others require senior judgment and should remain there.
Client Staffing Rules
Outside counsel guidelines may restrict number of timekeepers, partner attendance, multiple attendees, training time, or clerical work. Staffing analysis must consider the client's rules.
Cost and Pricing
Role mix affects internal labor cost, effective rate, flat-fee margin, budget performance, and client perception. Combine time data with internal cost and fee data.
Delegation Opportunities
A delegation review should classify work by the judgment and support it requires. The aim is appropriate delivery, not automatically moving all senior work to lower-cost roles.
Work classification | Review before changing the assignment |
Requires partner judgment | Retain senior responsibility where the decision needs it. |
Suitable for an associate | Check competence, the task's complexity, and supervision. |
Suitable for a paralegal | Confirm the permitted scope and required oversight. |
Administrative or support work | Separate coordination from work requiring legal judgment. |
Candidate for automation | Assess suitability and the human review still required. |
Do not delegate beyond competence, supervision, or client requirements.
Matter Comparison
Compare similar matters by role mix, total effort, phase effort, outcome, fee, scope, and complexity. Avoid comparing unlike matters.
Staffing Drift
A matter may begin with one staffing plan and gradually shift. Watch for rising partner share, more timekeepers joining, repeated rework, specialist involvement, or scope expansion.

Metrics
Use several measures together: total hours alone cannot explain the delivery profile of a matter. Compare matters with similar scope, complexity, and fee arrangements.
Staffing measure | What it helps you examine |
Partner, associate, and paralegal shares | The balance of effort across the principal roles. |
Number of timekeepers | How many people contributed to delivery. |
Hours by phase | How effort and role mix changed through the matter. |
Internal labor cost | The cost implications of hours and role mix. |
Client adjustments by role | Where staffing-related billing questions may warrant review. |
Combine reviewed time data with downstream cost and billing information; a staffing measure does not establish the right staffing model by itself.
How MIRA Fits
MIRA helps improve the time dataset by capturing and organizing work activity for reviewed entry. Staffing analysis requires timekeeper identity, matter, duration, and downstream cost or billing data. MIRA does not decide the correct staffing model by itself.
Related Resources
Frequently Asked Questions
What is matter staffing analysis?
It examines how professional effort is distributed across roles and matter phases.
Does partner-heavy staffing always mean inefficiency?
No. Some matters require senior judgment.
Can staffing analysis support flat-fee pricing?
Yes, because role mix affects delivery cost.
Can MIRA recommend staffing?
MIRA can improve time data, but staffing decisions require matter, skill, client, and management context.

